Difference .Net/Win32 with missing libraries?
Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2021 6:15 am
> And AFAIK the company of Arne has a system to load nearly all DLLs delayed.
Yes, it is still mostly true. Fortunately we could use the advantages of Dotnet. Now more dlls are included in the start exe, as code takes less space in memory. We merged also some smaller dlls to reduce the number of dlls. But nevertheless much code is loaded on demand. Standard usage needs about 20% to 25% of the dlls. All other dll loading depends on the usage of the customer/user. Report windows for example are loaded only randomly and we can see that users use reports much less than years before.
Arne
Yes, it is still mostly true. Fortunately we could use the advantages of Dotnet. Now more dlls are included in the start exe, as code takes less space in memory. We merged also some smaller dlls to reduce the number of dlls. But nevertheless much code is loaded on demand. Standard usage needs about 20% to 25% of the dlls. All other dll loading depends on the usage of the customer/user. Report windows for example are loaded only randomly and we can see that users use reports much less than years before.
Arne