xsharp.eu

Hi Robert,

Now that I have been coding X# more than researching stuff for Cologne in April, I find myself coding X# WPF/XAML apps in the MVVM pattern, with increasing use of the single dot, and in many places where previously it was a 'MUST' to get it right and have a colon (double dot) - and not a single dot!!

Since the script in XAML for data binding takes a single 'dot' I have slipped into the easy habit of typing a single dot everywhere it seems, except in the becomes equal to ':=' that we xBasers all love ;-0)

Oh! and I currently am placing a double dot after 'self' which seems to be harder to drop as a habit (comes natural after all these years). Just tried it and it fails with a single dot after 'self'. Why is this then?

Have you got any advice on all of this 'dot' stuff, or should I just go with the flow and do as I wish, like, choose ? And how does that affect the eNotes I write for others? Should I be following some kind of an unwritten rule?

Here are some code samples from a compiling and working app :-
Hope that helps you to advise me ;-0)

Best regards,
Phil.
Wales, UK.

Phil,

The single dot after SELF and SUPER are not allowed in the current build, but this is something that I fixed. That was a small glitch in the Beta 9 (and older) compiler.

We have decided to allow the single dot since that makes converting examples from C# and VB to X# much easier.

I personally liked the difference between the single dot for namespaces/static properties and colon for instance members, but found that many people did not see/understand the difference.

For example, how to translate

from C# to Vulcan/X#.
Many people did not understand that this has to be written in Vulcan as:
They did not understand that the example had 3 different meanings for the Dot (from left to right):
[*]
[*]a namespace delimiter
[*]accessing a static property in the DateTime structure
[*]calling a method on an instance of the DateTime structure


With the new syntax you can now also write it in X# like in C#.

Robert

Thanks Robert,

I fully understand - AND - look forward to 'self.' as I use it a lot with a double dot at the moment.  'super.' is not so important to me but I will be consistent with both.

Yes, I also agree with you about us understanding the meaning (difference) - BUT - since we will in a C# world, and need samples/examples, then I think it is a great benefit (to many) for us to be able to have both ways.

So to summarise ?  I will just do my thing and use what feels right to me at the time ;-0) For creating my eNotes for "ClickStart" and conferences.
Regards,
Phil.