xsharp.eu

Sorry for what will likely be a very basic question, but in X# how can a function declaration specify an unknown, variable number of parameters?

Something that could allow the implementation of the MIN() VFP function as close as possible to:

António,

There are two different ways. For untyped functions, you can use the PCount() / _GetFParam() pairs of intrinsic functions, to retrieve amount of parameters passed and each of them:


For strongly typed functions/methods, you can use the same mechanism that c# uses as well, with the params keyword (ParamArray attribute in X#):

Hi Chris,

When i compile your TypedFunc() i get the warning:

warning XS0674: Do not use 'System.ParamArrayAttribute'. Use the 'params' keyword instead.

Finally i found out how to use the PARAMS keyword:


Isn´t it possible to pass a var by ref ? I tried "@c" and "REF c" but that doesn´t work.

regards
Karl-Heinz

Hi Karl-Heinz,

Ah, right I keep forgetting that it is possible to also use the PARAMS keyword!

No, you can't pass params by reference like that, after all there's not a parameter variable name in the receiving function to assign back a new value to it. You could say you could put back the value to the array element, but if you want to do this, you can pass an array to a regular function in the first place...

Chris wrote:Hi Karl-Heinz,

No, you can't pass params by reference like that...

thanks, already thought that this would not work.

regards
Karl-Heinz

Thank you both, Chris and Karl-Heinz. I'm experimenting with this and it is working.

Hi to all!

Is there any way to save information about parameter types when calling functions with a variable number of parameters?

For example, there is a function: All options in the project properties in the "Language" and "Dialect" sections (except for Unsafe code) are disabled (FALSE).

Call: Result:

a[1]: System.IntPtr, OBJECT {PTR}
a[2]: System.String, OBJECT {STRING}
a[3]: System.UInt32, OBJECT {DWORD}
a[4]: null, OBJECT // exception

Type information lost for a[4]

Enable the "Allow late binding" property in TRUE.
Call function (previous example)

Result:

a[1]: null, OBJECT // exception
a[2]: System.String, OBJECT {STRING}
a[3]: System.UInt32, OBJECT {DWORD}
a[4]: null, OBJECT // exception

Type information lost for a[1] and a[4]

Best regards,
Leonid

Leonid,

The /vo2 compiler setting determines how NULL_STRING is interpreted.
With /vo2+ it will replace NULL_STRING with String.Empty. In that case the 4th parameter will have the right type.
When I run your code with only /vo2+ I see the following result I fyou look at the code with ILSpy you will see that the NULL_PTR is translated to When I enable /lb+ I see that the translation of NULL_PTR has become I am not sure why that is, but this needs to be fixed.

Robert

Robert,

I turned on /vo2+ and I managed to save the string type. This is what I need. But PTR is still a problem. It comes into function as NULL.

I modified the example a bit as follows. And Call: The parameter 'p' takes the type System.Void *. And this is exactly the type that I expect. In particular, I expect this from type a[1], because NULL_PTR is also passed to it, but this does not happen. It contains NULL. (at /lb+ and at /lb-)

When I create a library (.dll) in XSharp and place a function in it, where one or several parameters are described as AS PTR, then if you look at its MethodInfo, it shows this parameter as type System.Void * (not System.IntPtr). If the function has overloads, then in order to correctly extract the necessary overload using the Type.GetMethod() method, I need to pass in it an array of exact parameter types of the desired function. And if you pass System.IntPtr to the example I gave, instead of System.Void *, then Type.GetMethod() will return null (not found).

P.S. I am developing a generic function to call other functions from dynamically loaded assemblies. AssemblyName, ClassName, FunctionName and parameters of the called function (variable length, via PARAMS) are passed to this general function. And for this it is very important to extract valid types from PARAMS.

P.S.2. The problematic example is in the attachment.

Best regards,
Leonid

Leonid,

I already confirmed that there is a problem with NULL_PTR being passed incorrectly to a function that takes a PARAMS OBJECT[] yesterday when /lb+ is enabled.
I am already working on this.

Robert